## lucene评分学习

Implementation of Similarity with the Vector Space Model.

Similarity 实现了空间向量模型。

Expert: Scoring API.

专家：评分API

TFIDFSimilarity defines the components of Lucene scoring. Overriding computation of these components is a convenient way to alter Lucene scoring.

TFIDFSimilarity 定义了lucene评分组件。重写这些组件的计算是一种方便的方式来改变Lucene的评分。

Suggested reading: Introduction To Information Retrieval, Chapter 6.

建议阅读：Introduction To Information Retrieval, Chapter 6.

### BM、VSM

The following describes how Lucene scoring evolves from underlying information retrieval models to (efficient) implementation. We first brief on VSM Score, then derive from it Lucene’s Conceptual Scoring Formula, from which, finally, evolves Lucene’s Practical Scoring Function (the latter is connected directly with Lucene classes and methods).

下面介绍Lucene评分在底层的信息检索模型演变（高效）实现细节。我们首先介绍VSM Score，然后从它派生Lucene的概念的评分公式中，演变出Lucene’s Practical Scoring Function (Lucene的实用评分功能)（后者直接相连Lucene的类和方法）

Lucene combines Boolean model (BM) of Information Retrieval with Vector Space Model (VSM) of Information Retrieval – documents “approved” by BM are scored by VSM.

Lucene结合布尔模型(BM)信息检索和向量空间模型(VSM)信息检索.文件”批准”通过BM，评分通过VSM。例如查询的时候就是一个Bool查询，评分是通过VSM。

In VSM, documents and queries are represented as weighted vectors in a multi-dimensional space, where each distinct index term is a dimension, and weights are Tf-idf values.

在VSM中，文档和查询表示为在一个多维空间中的加权向量，其中每个不同的索引term是一个维度，权重是TF-IDF值。

VSM does not require weights to be Tf-idf values, but Tf-idf values are believed to produce search results of high quality, and so Lucene is using Tf-idf. Tf and Idf are described in more detail below, but for now, for completion, let’s just say that for given term t and document (or query) x, Tf(t,x) varies with the number of occurrences of term t in x (when one increases so does the other) and idf(t) similarly varies with the inverse of the number of index documents containing term t.

VSM score of document d for query q is the Cosine Similarity of the weighted query vectors V(q) and V(d):

Where V(q) · V(d) is the dot product of the weighted vectors, and |V(q)| and |V(d)| are their Euclidean norms.

Note: the above equation can be viewed as the dot product of the normalized weighted vectors, in the sense that dividing V(q) by its euclidean norm is normalizing it to a unit vector.

Lucene refines VSM score for both search quality and usability:

Normalizing V(d) to the unit vector is known to be problematic in that it removes all document length information. For some documents removing this info is probably ok, e.g. a document made by duplicating a certain paragraph 10 times, especially if that paragraph is made of distinct terms. But for a document which contains no duplicated paragraphs, this might be wrong. To avoid this problem, a different document length normalization factor is used, which normalizes to a vector equal to or larger than the unit vector: doc-len-norm(d).

At indexing, users can specify that certain documents are more important than others, by assigning a document boost. For this, the score of each document is also multiplied by its boost value doc-boost(d).

Lucene is field based, hence each query term applies to a single field, document length normalization is by the length of the certain field, and in addition to document boost there are also document fields boosts.

The same field can be added to a document during indexing several times, and so the boost of that field is the multiplication of the boosts of the separate additions (or parts) of that field within the document.

At search time users can specify boosts to each query, sub-query, and each query term, hence the contribution of a query term to the score of a document is multiplied by the boost of that query term query-boost(q).

A document may match a multi term query without containing all the terms of that query (this is correct for some of the queries), and users can further reward documents matching more query terms through a coordination factor, which is usually larger when more terms are matched: coord-factor(q,d).

Under the simplifying assumption of a single field in the index, we get Lucene’s Conceptual scoring formula:

The conceptual formula is a simplification in the sense that (1) terms and documents are fielded and (2) boosts are usually per query term rather than per query.

### Lucene’s Practical Scoring Function

We now describe how Lucene implements this conceptual scoring formula, and derive from it Lucene’s Practical Scoring Function.

For efficient score computation some scoring components are computed and aggregated in advance:

1.Query-boost for the query (actually for each query term) is known when search starts.

2.Query Euclidean norm |V(q)| can be computed when search starts, as it is independent of the document being scored. From search optimization perspective, it is a valid question why bother to normalize the query at all, because all scored documents will be multiplied by the same |V(q)|, and hence documents ranks (their order by score) will not be affected by this normalization. There are two good reasons to keep this normalization:

(1)Recall that Cosine Similarity can be used find how similar two documents are. One can use Lucene for e.g. clustering, and use a document as a query to compute its similarity to other documents. In this use case it is important that the score of document d3 for query d1 is comparable to the score of document d3 for query d2. In other words, scores of a document for two distinct queries should be comparable. There are other applications that may require this. And this is exactly what normalizing the query vector V(q) provides: comparability (to a certain extent) of two or more queries.

(2)Applying query normalization on the scores helps to keep the scores around the unit vector, hence preventing loss of score data because of floating point precision limitations.

3.Document length norm doc-len-norm(d) and document boost doc-boost(d) are known at indexing time. They are computed in advance and their multiplication is saved as a single value in the index: norm(d). (In the equations below, norm(t in d) means norm(field(t) in doc d) where field(t) is the field associated with term t.)

Lucene’s Practical Scoring Function is derived from the above. The color codes demonstrate how it relates to those of the conceptual formula:

**where **

**1.tf(t in d)** correlates to the term’s frequency, defined as the number of times term t appears in the currently scored document d. Documents that have more occurrences of a given term receive a higher score. Note that tf(t in q) is assumed to be 1 and therefore it does not appear in this equation, However if a query contains twice the same term, there will be two term-queries with that same term and hence the computation would still be correct (although not very efficient). The default computation for tf(t in d) in DefaultSimilarity is:

**2.idf(t)** stands for Inverse Document Frequency. This value correlates to the inverse of docFreq (the number of documents in which the term t appears). This means rarer terms give higher contribution to the total score. idf(t) appears for t in both the query and the document, hence it is squared in the equation. The default computation for idf(t) in DefaultSimilarity is:

**3.coord(q,d)** is a score factor based on how many of the query terms are found in the specified document. Typically, a document that contains more of the query’s terms will receive a higher score than another document with fewer query terms. This is a search time factor computed in coord(q,d) by the Similarity in effect at search time.

**4.queryNorm(q) **is a normalizing factor used to make scores between queries comparable. This factor does not affect document ranking (since all ranked documents are multiplied by the same factor), but rather just attempts to make scores from different queries (or even different indexes) comparable. This is a search time factor computed by the Similarity in effect at search time. The default computation in DefaultSimilarity produces a Euclidean norm:

The sum of squared weights (of the query terms) is computed by the query org.apache.lucene.search.Weight object. For example, a org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery computes this value as:

**5.t.getBoost()** is a search time boost of term t in the query q as specified in the query text (see query syntax), or as set by application calls to setBoost(). Notice that there is really no direct API for accessing a boost of one term in a multi term query, but rather multi terms are represented in a query as multi TermQuery objects, and so the boost of a term in the query is accessible by calling the sub-query getBoost().

**6.norm(t,d)** encapsulates a few (indexing time) boost and length factors:

**Field boost** – set by calling field.setBoost() before adding the field to a document.

**lengthNorm** – computed when the document is added to the index in accordance with the number of tokens of this field in the document, so that shorter fields contribute more to the score. LengthNorm is computed by the Similarity class in effect at indexing.

The computeNorm method is responsible for combining all of these factors into a single float.

When a document is added to the index, all the above factors are multiplied. If the document has multiple fields with the same name, all their boosts are multiplied together:

Note that search time is too late to modify this norm part of scoring, e.g. by using a different Similarity for search.

最近在学习lucene评分，以上是TFIDFSimilarity对lucene评分注解。先收集着，慢慢研究。

参考资料：

Boolean model (BM) of Information Retrieval

Vector Space Model (VSM) of Information Retrieval

Euclidean_norm

http://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/html/htmledition/computing-scores-in-a-complete-search-system-1.html#ch:cosine

本文固定链接: http://www.chepoo.com/lucene-score-study.html | IT技术精华网